| Catsy ( @ 2007-02-14 10:34:00 |
Why you shouldn't buy "24" DVDs, in Joel Surnow's words
I used to be a big fan of "24". I followed the first two seasons religiously, and fell off the adrenaline train during the third season, which just wasn't captivating enough to keep me watching through all the chaos in my life at the time. I've entertained thoughts of picking it back up again, because I remember it being really good, tense television. I never end up doing so, partially because the same basic plot just gets recycled over and over again, but also because the efforts of the Bush administration to justify and legitimize torture have caused me to reflect on the moral quandaries involved to the point where those scenes distress me a lot more than they used to.
The final straw that broke any chances of my buying any "24" DVDs came with this article, in which we learn what a monstrous creature creator Joel Surnow is.
You need to read the article from beginning to end. And reflect on whether or not you want to give money to this man:
If you think America shouldn't be in the business of torturing people, and you don't want to subsidize a right-wing nutjob who's determined to use his show to convince people that we should, then don't give money to Joel Surnow. Don't buy 24.
I used to be a big fan of "24". I followed the first two seasons religiously, and fell off the adrenaline train during the third season, which just wasn't captivating enough to keep me watching through all the chaos in my life at the time. I've entertained thoughts of picking it back up again, because I remember it being really good, tense television. I never end up doing so, partially because the same basic plot just gets recycled over and over again, but also because the efforts of the Bush administration to justify and legitimize torture have caused me to reflect on the moral quandaries involved to the point where those scenes distress me a lot more than they used to.
The final straw that broke any chances of my buying any "24" DVDs came with this article, in which we learn what a monstrous creature creator Joel Surnow is.
You need to read the article from beginning to end. And reflect on whether or not you want to give money to this man:
He said of Reagan, “I can hardly think of him without breaking into tears. I just felt Ronald Reagan was the father that this country needed. . . . He made me feel good that I was in his family.”
Surnow said that he found the Clinton years obnoxious. “Hollywood under Clinton—it was like he was their guy,” he said. “He was the yuppie, baby-boomer narcissist that all of Hollywood related to.” During those years, Surnow recalled, he had countless arguments with liberal colleagues, some of whom stopped speaking to him. “My feeling is that the liberals’ ideas are wrong,” he said. “But they think I’m evil.” Last year, he contributed two thousand dollars to the losing campaign of Pennsylvania’s hard-line Republican senator Rick Santorum, because he “liked his position on immigration.”
[...]
In recent years, Surnow and Nowrasteh have participated in the Liberty Film Festival, a group dedicated to promoting conservatism through mass entertainment. Surnow told me that he would like to counter the prevailing image of Senator Joseph McCarthy as a demagogue and a liar. Surnow and his friend Ann Coulter—the conservative pundit, and author of the pro-McCarthy book “Treason”—talked about creating a conservative response to George Clooney’s recent film “Good Night, and Good Luck.” Surnow said, “I thought it would really provoke people to do a movie that depicted Joe McCarthy as an American hero or, maybe, someone with a good cause who maybe went too far.” He likened the Communist sympathizers of the nineteen-fifties to terrorists: “The State Department in the fifties was infiltrated by people who were like Al Qaeda.” But, he said, he shelved the project. “The blacklist is Hollywood’s orthodoxy,” he said. “It’s not a movie I could get done now.”
A year and a half ago, Surnow and Manny Coto, a “24” writer with similar political views, talked about starting a conservative television network. “There’s a gay network, a black network—there should be a conservative network,” Surnow told me. But as he and Coto explored the idea they realized that “we weren’t distribution guys—we were content guys.” Instead, the men developed “The Half Hour News Hour,” the conservative satire show. “ ‘The Daily Show’ tips left,” Surnow said. “So we thought, Let’s do one that tips right.” Jon Stewart’s program appears on Comedy Central, an entertainment channel. But, after Surnow got Rush Limbaugh to introduce him to Roger Ailes, Fox News agreed to air two episodes.
[...]
In fact, many prominent conservatives speak of “24” as if it were real. John Yoo, the former Justice Department lawyer who helped frame the Bush Administration’s “torture memo”—which, in 2002, authorized the abusive treatment of detainees—invokes the show in his book “War by Other Means.” He asks, “What if, as the popular Fox television program ‘24’ recently portrayed, a high-level terrorist leader is caught who knows the location of a nuclear weapon?” Laura Ingraham, the talk-radio host, has cited the show’s popularity as proof that Americans favor brutality. “They love Jack Bauer,” she noted on Fox News. “In my mind, that’s as close to a national referendum that it’s O.K. to use tough tactics against high-level Al Qaeda operatives as we’re going to get.” Surnow once appeared as a guest on Ingraham’s show; she told him that, while she was undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer, “it was soothing to see Jack Bauer torture these terrorists, and I felt better.” Surnow joked, “We love to torture terrorists—it’s good for you!”
If you think America shouldn't be in the business of torturing people, and you don't want to subsidize a right-wing nutjob who's determined to use his show to convince people that we should, then don't give money to Joel Surnow. Don't buy 24.